Birmingham Hip Resurfacing - Literature Review

Patient Demographics

Demographics for X-Ray, Oswestry, McMinn, and Overall McMinn cohorts
Patients in the Overall McMinn cohort were 70.6% men and 29.4% women, ages 13-86 years (average 53.1 years). The primary diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 75.0%, dysplasia in 15.8%, avascular necrosis in 4.1%, inflammatory arthritis in 2.4%, and “other” in 2.7% (Table 4).

Table 4: Procedure Demographics

  X-Ray Cohort Oswestry Cohort McMinn Cohort Overall McMinn
Hips 124 1502 759 2385
Men 81 (65.3%) 1082 (72.0%) 520 (68.5%) 1683 (70.6%)
Women 43 (34.7%) 420 (28.0%) 239 (31.5%) 702 (29.4%)
Age (range) 52.8 (27.8 - 75.3) 53.0 (13.4 - 86.5) 53.3 (21.6 - 79.5) 53.1 (13.4 - 86.5)
Age ≤ 65 years 111 (89.5%) 1388 (92.4%) 692 (91.2%) 2191 (91.9%)
         
Dx: OA 92 (74.2%) 1171 (78.0%) 526 (69.3%) 1789 (75.0%)
Dx: DDH 22 (17.7%) 197 (13.1%) 1580 (20.8%) 377 (15.8%)
Dx: AVN 7 (5.6%) 59 (13.9%) 31 (4.1%) 97 (4.1%)
Dx: Inflammatory 2 (1.6%) 39 (2.6%) 16 (2.1%) 57 (2.4%)
Dx: Other 1 (0.8%) 36 (2.4%) 28 (3.7%) 65 (2.7%)

Demographics for X-Ray/Oswestry combined cohort
Patients in the survivorship study (X-ray/Oswestry combined cohort) ranged in age from 13.4 to 86.5 years (mean 53 years); 72% of the patients are male, and 28% are female. Of the 1,626 BHR procedures in this cohort, 1,499 (92%) were performed in patients < 65 years old, and 127 (8%) were performed in patients > 65 years old.

Diagnostic Indications for Unilateral and Bilateral procedures in X-Ray/Oswestry combined cohort
One thousand one hundred and eleven (1,111) of the X-ray/Oswestry combined cohort cases (68%) were unilateral procedures and 515 (32%) were bilateral procedures. The indication for the majority of cases was osteoarthritis. Table 5 provides the breakdown of unilateral and bilateral cases by indication.

Table 5: Diagnostic Indications for BHR
Diagnosis Unilateral Bilateral Total
Osteoarthritis 849 (76.4%) 414 (80.4%) 1263 (77.7%)
Dysplasia 160 (14.4%) 59 (11.5%) 219 (13.5%)
Avascular necrosis 52 (4.7%) 14 (2.7%) 66 (4.1%)
Inflammatory arthritis 18 (1.6%) 23 (4.5%) 41 (2.4%)
Other 32 (2.9%) 5 (1.0%) 37 (2.3%)
TOTAL 1111 (68%) 515 (32%) 1626

Some of the patients with bilateral hip replacements were included in different groups depending on when the second hip procedure was performed (Table 6).

Table 6: Hip Procedures
Cohort Patients** Hips*** Unilateral Bilateral Contralateral Single Hip Cohort* Singles
X-Ray Oswestry McMinn
X-Ray 113 124 83 11 - 11 8 19
Oswestry 1301 1502 1028 201 11 - 61 72
McMinn 685 759 542 74 8 61 - 69

* Patients with bilateral hip replacements with the contralateral hip not included in the first hip replacement’s evaluation cohort.
** Number of patients equals unilateral + bilateral + singles
*** Number of hips equals unilateral + (2 x bilateral) + singles

Demographics: Literature References
The study published by D'Antonio et al. reported findings from a multicenter study conducted at 22 investigational sites; the study published by Garino was conducted at 11 investigational sites (Table 7).

Table 7: Demograhpics for Literature Reference
Author Patients Procedures Age (average) Bilateral Procedures
D'Antonio et al. 458 514
-349 ceramic
- 165 control
53 19
Garino JP 333
(f=132, m=201)
333 52 0

D’Antonio et al. reported the indication for THR as osteoarthritis in 399/514 procedures (77.6%) and avascular necrosis in 82/514 procedures (16%) (Table 8).

Table 8: Indications for Use for Literature References
Diagnosis D'Antonio
Osteoarthritis 399
Traumatic Osteoarthritis/ DJD 21
Avascular necrosis 82
Other/ Not reported 12
TOTAL 514

Patient Accounting
The follow-up rates for the Combined X-Ray / Oswestry Cohort, upon which the effectiveness analyses were performed, at the 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, and 5-year postoperative evaluation time points were 76.6%, 77.3%, 88.1%, 88.6%, and 90.8%, respectively. There were 546 procedures (hips) evaluated at 5 years in this cohort (Table 9).

Table 9: Patient Accounting Based on the Number of Procedures
  Baseline 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Accounting for Survivorship (% Revision)
Cohort   # Patients observed at beginning of each study year (# revisions, # censored)1
X-Ray - 124 (1,0) 123 (0,0) 123 (1,0) 122 (0,0) 122 (0,20)6
Oswestry - 1502 (9,63) 1430(5,49) 1376 (4,256) 1116 (1,321) 794 (1,392)
McMinn - 759 (3,290) 466 (0,379) 87 (0,84) 3 (0,0)7 3 (0,0)7
X-Ray Cohort
Expected1,8 124 123 123 122 122 1183
Evaluated2 82 101 51 122 119 112
F/U %2 66.1% 82.1% 41.4% 100.0% 97.5% 94.9%
Evaluated4 124 - - - - 108
F/U %4 100% - - - - 91.5%
Oswestry Cohort
Expected1,8 1502 1493 1484 1227 885 482
Evaluated2 1229 1137 1192 1067 773 434
F/U %2 81.8% 76.2% 80.3% 87.0% 87.3% 90.0%
X-Ray /  Oswestry Cohort
Theoretical1 1626 1626 1626 1385 1045 647
Deaths (procedures) 0 2 7 16 18 26
Revisons
(cumulative)
0 10 15 20 21 23
Expected1,8 1626 1616 1607 1349 1007 601
Evaluated2 1311 1238 1243 1189 892 546
F/U %2 80.6% 76.6% 77.3% 88.1% 88.6% 90.8%
 
F/U +base5 1311 1067/1304 1050/1294 944/1046 660/729 368/397
+base %   82% 81% 90% 91% 93%
F/U -base5 315 171/312 193/313 245/303 232/281 178/204
-base %   55% 62% 81% 83% 87%

1 Note that for the Survivorship data the “year 1” data is starting from day 1 and the “year 2” data is starting from day 366, etc. but for the OSHIP scores, the “year 1” data was collected between day 366-730, the “year 2” data was collected between day 731-1095, etc.
2 Evaluated by OSHIP score.
3 OSHIP score was available for one hip that was revised shortly after the 5-year follow-up interval, OSHIP data available on 112/119 (94.1%) of hips surviving to 5 years.
4 Evaluated by X-Ray.
5 The follow-up of those who had baseline OSHIP scores (+base) and those without baseline OSHIP scores (-base).
6 Note that there were 2 revisions in the x-ray cohort at >5 years.
7 There were 5 cases in the McMinn cohort whose implantations were performed prior to 4/02. These cases should have been part of the Oswestry cohort, but for unknown reasons were not. Therefore, unlike the majority of the McMinn cohort, some of these 5 cases have longer term follow-up.
8 The expected and evaluated values in each interval include hips with a recorded OSHIP even if the subject died or was revised during the interval.

For the unilateral patients in the X-Ray / Oswestry combined cohort, the follow-up rates at the 1-year, 2-year, 3- year, 4-year, and 5-year postoperative evaluation time points were 75.7%, 76.6%, 88.2%, 88.4%, and 91.1%, respectively (Table 10).

Table 10: Patient Accounting
Summary of the Oswestry and X-Ray Cohorts - Unilateral Based on Available OSHIP Data

  Baseline 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years
Theoretical 1111 1103 1100 927 395 395
OSHIP data 892 835 842 818 607 360
% 80.3 75.7 76.5 88.2 88.4 91.1

Accounting identified in the literature references were as provided in Table 11.

Table 11: Patient Accounting: Literature References
Author Mean follow-up (range) Number of hips (patients) included
D'Antonio




 
35.2 mo (24 - 48 mo) for ceramic on ceramic.
33.6 mo (24 - 48 mo) for control (metal on polythylene)

 
• 335 hips (307 pts) at 24 mos
• 243 hips (227 pts) at 36 mos
• 72 hips (71 pts) at 48 mos
165 control THR procedures (161 patients),
• 149 hips (147 pts) at 24 mos
• 111 hips (111 pts) at 36 mos
• 26 hips (26 pts) at 48 mos
Garino Range 18 - 36 months "100% follow-up for all 333 procedures"


Return to BHR Literature Review

Back to Patient Education - Hip

2/4/2007

OUR SERVICES  |  PATIENT EDUCATION  |  ABOUT DR. ROGERSON
CLINIC INFORMATION  |  OUR TEAM  |  CURRICULUM VITAE