| |
TWO YEAR METAL ION LEVELS
IN PATIENTS WITH
METAL-ON-METAL ARTHROPLASTY
Anastasia K. Skipor1, Patricia A. Campbell2,
Harlan C. Amstutz2 and Joshua J. Jacobs1
1Orthopedic Surgery, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center,
Chicago II 60612
2Joint Replacement Institute, Orthopedic Hospital, Los Angeles CA 90007
Metal-on-metal articulation is becoming a more accepted
alternative in hip replacement surgery. It is also intended for the
younger and more active patient where polyethylene wear and its
accompanying osteolysis of the more conventional metal-on-polyethylene
bearings is of most concern. Surface arthroplasty of the hip is a
conservative procedure designed to retain valuable femoral bone stock in
younger patients. In this study we examine serum chromium (SrCr) and
cobalt (SrCo) and urine chromium (UrCr) in patients with metal-on-metal
surface arthroplasty (SA) of the hip.
This is a
prospective study. Nine patients with metal-on-metal surface
arthroplasty of the hip are presented. The patients were implanted with
the Conserve+® surface arthroplasty. The acetabular component consists
of one piece and has sintered CoCr (F75) beads on the outer surface
designed for interference fitting to obtain initial stability. The
femoral component is a CoCr (F75) hemispheric shell with a chamfered
cylindrical interior design and a short tapered stem to enhance
alignment and stability. The femoral head size ranged from 40 to 52 mm.
There were 6 males and 3 females with an average age at implantation of
45 years (range 28 - 59 years). The components were manufactured by
Wright Medical Technology Inc. (Arlington, TN, USA) Serum and urine
samples were collected pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months post
implantation. Serum was assayed for Cr and Co and urine for Cr
concentration using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
The detection limits in serum were 0.03 ng/ml (ppb) for Cr and 0.3 ppb
for Co and 0.015 ppb for Cr in urine.
The concentration for SrCr, UrCr and SrCo for the nine cases,
are shown in Figs. 1-3, respectively. The data indicate that for SrCr,
levels are still elevated at 12 months postoperatively and then
decrease. Five of the nine cases had lower values at 24 months post
operatively than their previous sampled time period. A similar trend is
seen for SrCo but the change is more dramatic following the 6 month
postoperative time period (Fig 3). Of the nine cases 7 had SrCo levels
at 24 months post operatively lower than their previous sampled time
period, (Fig 2). UrCr levels increase up to 12 months and then begin to
decline. Six of the 8 cases for which we had urine levels at 24 months
post operatively demonstrated lower values than their previous sampled
time period.
Discussion
This group of patients is a subset of a larger
group that we are following prospectively. As can be seen with the
exception of SrCo all post-operative time periods had elevated levels
compared to their pre-operative levels, and these levels are higher than
those observed in patients with metal-on-poly bearings1. However over
50% of these individuals had lower levels at their latest follow-up
compared to their previous sampled time period. In the case of SrCo two
cases have already returned to their pre-operative levels by 24 months
post-operative. The data demonstrate that the values by two years begin
to decline. It is still early to tell with any certainty due to the
small sample size but the wear in period of these devices is
longer than the accepted 1-year or 1 million cycles generally
observed in metal-on-poly bearings. |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
While the
wear properties of metal-on-metal bearings are better than those
observed in metal-on-poly bearings, the wear particles generated by
these bearings are greater in number and smaller in size. Therefore for
a given wear volume many more particles will be released into the
surrounding tissue and be available for corrosion and subsequent release
of metal ions into the system. The decline in metal ion levels in most
of these patients supports the anticipated low steady state wear in well
functioning metal-on-metal bearings.
1. Jacobs, J.J. et. al. JBJS 80-A:1447-1458.
2. Doom, P.P. et. al. JBMR 442:103-111
Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Return to Metal-on-Metal
Articulation: Ions
Return to Patient Education
12/19/2004
OUR
SERVICES | PATIENT EDUCATION
| ABOUT DR. ROGERSON
CLINIC INFORMATION |
OUR TEAM |
CURRICULUM VITAE

|